Cataclysmic Climate and Standing Waves

__Easterbrook_Intro
Exhibit-01

The most precise records of late Pleistocene climate change are the ice cores of the Greenland Ice Sheet Project (GISP) and the Greenland Ice Core Project (GRIP). Exhibit-01 above shows ice core temperature data from 14,000 BC to 2,000 AD. During that period climate experts have identified ten climate events as potentially catastrophic in nature. However, our focus is on three mega-events that occurred between 13,000 and 9,500 BCE.

Climate events that changed the world

14000-8000_Temperature_Overlay_Events2
Exhibit-02

Starting in about 13,000 (BCE) the Earth experienced three major climatic catastrophes–one after another; e.g. (1-Bölling-Allerød, 2-Younger-Dryas and 3-Pre-boreal warming periods). That 1-2-3 punch annihilated a significant percentage of life on Earth.

The cause of these events is a hotly debated subject. 

The climate establishment views the events as being random in nature and most likely caused by bolide impacts and/or by melt-water-pulses. The Electric Universe suggests a series of Solar discharges were the cause. We propose that all three events were triggered mechanically by a series of standing waves. If what we propose turns out to be true, then, the timing of these types of events may be predictable.

Exhibit-3 shows a standing wave that has been associated with Jupiter. It is overlayed on top of ice-core temperatures (covering the period from 14,000 to 8,000 BCE). We ask that you pay particular attention to the wave nodes and anti-nodes (peeks and throughs) as they appear to be perfectly sequenced with all the critical temperature turning-points.

14000-8000_Temperature_Overlay_Exhibit3
Exhibit-03

The waves on the chart have been constructed in the same way the standing waves on the scope shown in the following picture:

The wave-scope

Jupiter is the largest planet in our solar system, weighing in at more than twice as much as all of the other planets combined and its influence is, littery, that of a GOD. Jupiter wields that influence through its progression of Ultra-Low Frequency Waves (ULF).

Ultra-Low Frequency “Standing Waves” Are Key to Space Weather

On Earth, our magnetic shield protects us against harmful radiation from the sun (and more distant sources). The upper regions of our atmosphere is full of these ULF waves which transfer energy from outside Earth’s magnetic shield to regions inside it. The geomagnetic storms that we observe, for example, are a common manifestation.

The data we’ve gathered suggests that these standing waves have a profound effect on the earth’s climate and the following illustration will tell the story.

14000-8000_Temperature_Overlay_Exhibit5.2
Exhibit-04

Exhibit-4 shows the points of destructive and constructive interference (principle characteristics of standing waves). The vertical red dotted-lines on the above chart flag the timing of the nodes while the vertical green dotted-lines flag the timing of the anti-nodes.  The visual correlations of temperature turning-points with the nodes and anti-nodes are absolutely stunning.

14000-8000_Temperature_Overlay_Exhibit7
Exhibit-05

Exhibit-5 shows what is commonly referred to as the Incident wave (blue-dotted line) and the Reflected wave (green-dotted line) from which the vibrational frequencies (contained within) manifest the Resultant or mean wave (red/orange).

Waventerference
Exhibit-6

Technically, Standing waves are stationary electric-only voltage potential oscillations, that produce electrical longitudinal vibrations (red wave). They are acted upon by traveling waves as illustrated in Exhibit-6.

The analytical values associated with sine waves are its period, frequency and amplitude as is illustrated in Exhibit-7 below.

Oscillating Sine Wave
Exhibit-7

Amplitude

Amplitude refers to the amount of voltage between two points in a circuit. Amplitude commonly refers to the maximum voltage of a signal measured from the ground or zero volts. The waveform shown in Figure-7 has an amplitude of 1 V and a peak-to-peak voltage of 2 V. (think pressure)

Phase

The phase is best explained by looking at a sine wave. The voltage level of sine waves is based on circular motion. Given that a circle has 360°, one cycle of a sine wave has 360°, as shown in Figure-7. Using degrees, you can refer to the phase angle of a sine wave when you want to describe how much of the period has elapsed.

Phase shift describes the difference in timing between two otherwise similar signals. Exhibit-09 below shows standing waves from Jupiter and Saturn overlayed on the same temperature timeframe. It adds a whole new dimension to the wave profile.

123-Punch_0
Exhibit-09

Take particular notice of the “yellow circle” where the two wave patterns converge. That should identify the point of greatest physical destruction and loss of life. More on the dual wave interaction between Jupiter and Saturn in a later post.

123-Punch_0

Click on the follow button below to watch this story as it unfolds.

The next post will be an extensive audit of dates associated with abrupt climate shifts and related catastrophes from 14,000 BC to 2020 AD and correlated with points of constructive and destructive interference. You’ll want to see this.

TOMORROWS BREAKTHROUGHS WILL COME FROM THE VERY FRINGE OF SCIENTIFIC THINKING. HERE ARE JUST A FEW EXAMPLES OF REVOLUTIONARY IDEAS THAT ARE ALREADY IN PLAY.

(c) copyright by 2010-2020 -- Ronald G. Messick -- All Rights Reserved

 

90-years ago Walter Russell introduced to the world his Electric Universe Model.

Solar-System4

It has been 90-years since Walter Russell formally introduced his revolutionary cosmological theory of an electric universe—a theory so advanced that its truths proved to be well beyond the grasp of all but the most astute mainstream thinkers. His good friend, Nikola Tesla, had cautioned that he “lock this (Cosmic) knowledge in a safe for 1000-years until man is ready for it.” But Walter’s vision was all consuming and, with the zeal of an evangelist, he carried his message directly to the people (similar to using twitter today).

Within a week of his introduction in a New York Times article, a well-respected scientist, Dr. John E. Jackson, wrote an editorial to the New York Times, refuting everything that Walter Russell had stated in his article a week earlier. Soon other prominent scientists piled on. It wasn’t pretty.

This initial exchange of letters communicated through the New York Times went on through October of 1930. Read the editorial letters here.

Obviously, Tesla had known that for credentialed experts in mainstream science to accept the totality of Russell’s theories would require disavowing virtually everything they had previously learned and taught and that the chance of that happening was virtually nil.

Unfortunately, the same is true today.

But there is hope. Dr. Don Scott, an esteemed Professor, electrical engineer and, the author of The Electric Sun, says “until quite recently most astronomers barely gave electricity in space a sideways glance. And yet, through the back door, we now see a growing interest in the role of magnetism across the cosmos. In the rarefied plasma environment of space, magnetic fields are the proof of active electric currents, even if this proof is ignored. But with surprising rapidity, perhaps in the course of just 15 years, the “magnetic universe” has emerged as a permissible expression within the scientific mainstream. This radical turn may prove to be the most promising bridge to a shift in astrophysical perception, eventually making it impossible to ignore the electric currents without which the “magnetic universe” would disappear.”

Dr. Scott’s message—placing the emphasis on magnetic universe–should resonate with all of us in the Walter Russell community. There are astronomers and physicists out there who want to believe. But, first, they need something to believe in—a proof-of-concept (something incontrovertible).

Success will only come when Russell’s technologies are solving mainstream problems. But curiosity comes before interest. Solving a real, but small, problem, will cause others with similar problems to become curious. That is how it will begin.

Thank you for taking the time to read this article. Other articles that may be of interest are listed below:

If you liked the article, please like this page.

Ron Messick solarxgrid@gmail.com

(c) Copyright 2010-2020 by Ronald G. Messick (All Rights Reserved)

 

What’s Tugging on the Solar System?

Whats-Tugging-Gravity-Waves

Thank you for taking the time to read this article. A list of other relevant articles that may be of interest is listed below for your convenience.

If you found this article informative, please like this page.

Ron Messick solarxgrid@gmail.com

(c) Copyright 2010-2020 by Ronald G. Messick (All Rights Reserved)

A “SHOCKINGLY” BOLD ALTERNATIVE TO THE CURRENT ELECTRIC SUN THEORIES

How does the Sun distribute energy throughout the heliosphere–the bubble containing the solar system and everything in it?

The Bubble

A clue is found in a vacuum tube; more specifically, it is found in the cathode ray tube. This tube, abbreviated CRT, was the mainstay of desktop computer monitors for many years. In it, we have a heater that raises the temperature of a cathode to a point at which it gives off electrons in great quantities. These electrons are negative in nature. High positive voltages are supplied to various grids and anodes in the tube (see illustration).

Cathode-Ray-Tube

There are two types of electricity: positive and negative. The electron is negative and its counterpart, the proton is positive. Just as the north pole of a magnet will attract the south pole of another magnet, the electrons attract protons. Similar poles of magnets repel each other and so do similar charges of electricity. Likes repel; unlikes attract.

The high positive voltages on the grids and anodes of the CRT attract the electrons from the cathode. The electrons are pulled toward the anodes with great speed, but, due to the type of construction of these anodes, most electrons rush right on through toward the next one. Theoretically, this could be continued for great distances by the use of several different anodes and high positive voltages.

Mercury, Venus, Earth, and Mars are close enough to the Sun to get good radiation. With the planets beyond Mars, it is a different situation. At these distances, the Sun’s radiation has started to diminish. At this time it comes under the influence of the tremendous attracting force generated by the first anode, the main asteroid belt which totally envelops the central portion of our solar system. The negative charge of the asteroid belt is great enough to attract the particles from the Sun and pull them back up to their original speed. Because this belt is grid-like in construction, with thousands of openings and paths, similar to a window screen with air going through it, the particles dash on through and inter the influence of the planets beyond.

These, being negative in themselves, as all planets are, attract from space the positive particles they need for light and heat. At the same time, infinite numbers of similar particles rush on past and are attracted by the second anode, the Kuiper belt between Neptune and Pluto, where the process is repeated all over again. This furnishes Pluto and any undiscovered planets with normal light and heat.

The third anode (the Oort Cloud) is well beyond all known planets, serving a dual purpose of blending space within our system with that of neighboring systems. At the same time, it serves as a protective filter, comparable to the ionosphere encompassing a planet.

We might summarize by saying: The two inner asteroid belts gather rays from the Sun and speed them on through space. They equalize, so to speak, conditions within the system from the area of Mercury right on to the outer reaches of our solar system, while the third keeps our system, as a unit, in balance with those beyond.

With the asteroid belt, basically negative in nature, attracting Sun rays varying in length, speed, with, and charge, a condition is set into action comparable to an alternating current in electricity. Some of the positive particles are trapped within the asteroid belt, while others zip right on through to radiate through space beyond.

The law of attraction and repulsion permits a state of cohesion to take place between some of the particles within the belt, building larger forms, while a major percentage remain in their natural state. Particles of many sizes thus created are caused to constantly act on one another in energy and matter alike. This very action, while building some forms, also disintegrates other forms by separating the particles of which they are composed.

TOMORROWS BREAKTHROUGHS WILL COME FROM THE VERY FRINGE OF SCIENTIFIC THINKING. HERE ARE JUST A FEW EXAMPLES OF REVOLUTIONARY IDEAS THAT ARE ALREADY IN PLAY.

Copyright

Making a Solar Cycle–A New Perspective

Solar-cycle-large

The chart below shows published sunspot data from 1960 to 2020 overlayed with two standing waves. The waves themselves reflect Jupiter’s orbital relationship with the Sun’s rotation. The color-coded circles on the chart identify the points of destructive interference associated with each of the two waves. The preliminary findings are not definitive and more study is needed. But, there may well be more than a casual relationship.

Solar-Cycle-Foot-Prints

Technically, Standing waves are stationary electric-only voltage potential oscillations, that produce electrical longitudinal vibrations. They are acted upon by traveling waves.

The illustration below shows what is commonly referred to as the Incident wave (blue) and the Reflected wave (green) from which the vibrational frequencies (contained within) manifest the Resultant standing wave (red).

Waventerference

The analytical values of a sine wave are its period, frequency and amplitude.

Amplitude

Amplitude refers to the amount of voltage between two points in a circuit. Amplitude commonly refers to the maximum voltage of a signal measured from the ground or zero volts. The waveform example has an amplitude of 1 V and a peak-to-peak voltage of 2 V.

Phase

The phase is best explained by looking at a sine wave. The voltage level of sine waves is based on circular motion. Given that a circle has 360°, one cycle of a sine wave has 360°. Using degrees, you can refer to the phase angle of a sine wave when you want to describe how much of the period has elapsed. Phase shift describes the difference in timing between two otherwise similar signals.

Interestingly, the precession of these two standing waves are ultimately responsible for major climate turning-points. Check it out!

TOMORROWS BREAKTHROUGHS WILL COME FROM THE VERY FRINGE OF SCIENTIFIC THINKING. HERE ARE JUST A FEW EXAMPLES OF REVOLUTIONARY IDEAS THAT ARE ALREADY IN PLAY.

The Solar System’s Underlying Reality

 

AntikytheraMechanismSchematic2
Courtesy of Wikipedia

Planetary orbits are complicated. Typically, specialists in the fields of cosmology, astronomy, and orbital mechanics are necessary to explain how they work. But, recent findings suggest that there is a simpler underlying reality and provides a solar-system schematic to explain how it all works (YOU’LL WANT TO SEE THIS).

Instead of randomness as predicted by orbital mechanics, the schematic reveals the meticulous order that is responsible for the apparent clockwork motion of the planets. The same kind of meticulous order that is found in an automatic transmission–where the ring gear and planetary gears mesh together perfectly with the Sun Gear.

Automatic-Transmission

 

The purpose of schematics is to define relationships, i.e. (how one component in a system of components ties to everything else). In a solar system, those components are planets and moons.

What so often complicates matters for the layperson is that the effects of gravity diminish at the square of the distance as the components move farther and farther away from the Sun–requiring some knowledge of advanced mathematics. With the schematic, however, those complex relationships are explained using simple arithmetic.

The Sun contains a whopping 99.9% of all the mass in the solar system and its influence is, literally, that of a god. Its photospheric circumference is 2,714,503.909 miles and that is where the schematic begins.

Distances of planets, as described by astronomers, are all multiples of Earth’s distance from the Sun–commonly referred to as their number of astronomical units (AU).

The scheme associated with planetary orbits starts by multiplying the photospheric circumference of the Sun by the planet’s AU and then, multiplying the result by 216.

Accordingly, here is a table showing the distances, in miles, of all planetary orbits along with the steps taken to calculate them:Solar rotation at the root of planetary orbits

As one can see, the photospheric circumference lies at the core of all planetary motion.

Why the number 216?

It has been said that, in Vedic science, the number 216 is a sacred number and that it reflects the distance from the Sun to the Sky. That is exactly what a 360-degree orbit is–a perspective of the sky from the surface of an individual planet.

Is there a way to verify the accuracy of the orbital circumferences listed in the table?

Yes. When you multiply a planet’s distance (AUs) by 12^7 X 86,400, the result should be the planet’s orbital circumference (measured in feet). Dividing that figure by 5,280 should reconcile perfectly with orbital circumference listed in the table.

So, what is the lesson to be learned from all of this?

Perhaps, the most important lesson is that the Sun’s photosphere and the orbits of planets are inextricably linked and that the perimeter of an orbit is an electromagnetic field containing a precise amount of matter (energy). Should the photosphere of the Sun expand or contract for some reason, the result would be an expansion or contraction of the entire planetary system which would seem to support the theory of scalar motion.

The new science of Helioseismology may help to confirm the theory being proposed. It was recently discovered that our Sun generates 10^7 p and f waves alone (10-million). Even more interesting is that 10^7 multiplied by the Earth’s velocity (18.59267746) equals 185,926,774.6-miles–the precise length of the Earth’s major axes.

Now, if a centrifugal force is applied to axes of rotation (185,926,774.6 X 3.1536), would that not be the Earth’s orbital circumference (586,338,676.4-miles)?

Then, if we were to take the orbital circumference and divide it by the sacred Vedic number 216, would not the result be the Sun’s photospheric circumference ((586,338,676.4 / 216 = 2,714,530.909-miles?

Finally, if the photospheric circumference were to be divided by 109, would the result not be the equatorial circumference of the Earth (2,714,530.909 / 109 = 24,903.9533-miles?

You are probably saying to yourself “that may all be well and good, but where did you come with the velocity figure of 18.59267746 and the multiplier 3.1536 that was used to apply the centrifugal force?”

Here’s the answer: Earth’s orbital period is 365-days. So therefore, 365 X 86,400 = 31,536,000 seconds per-year. Now, if 31,536,000 is divided by 10^7 or 10,000,000 the result would be 3.1536—the Pi equivalent that is necessary to provide the precise amount of acceleration to sustain Earth’s orbit (31,536,000 / 10,000,000 = 3.1536).

As for the Earth’s velocity, all we need to do is divide the orbital circumference by the number of seconds in the orbit’s period (586,338.676.4 divided by 31,536,000-seconds calculates the Earth’s orbital velocity of 18.59267746-miles per/second).

If all of the above is true, then only one simple equation is all that is necessary to reconstruct the orbital measurements of the entire solar system and to define each planet’s unique relationship with the Sun:

  1. 10^7 X AUs X 18.59267746 = major axes
  2. Major Axes X Pi(3.1536) = Orbital Circumference
  3. Orbital Circumference / 216 / AUs = Sun’s photospheric circumference.

The calculated results define each planet’s position in the gravity well:

Gravity-well_Solar-system-schemetic

What follows is the real takeaway from this post. The infinity symbol, introduced in 1655 by John Wallis a mathematician, is also found in many ancient cultures. In truth, it is one and the same as Faraday’s first observation of a standing wave in 1831. The standing wave, itself, is how electricity manifests itself and is the dominant wave structure in the universe.

Electromagnetic-Wave-Structure

The green and red lines in the above diagram are force fields with different polarities and travel in opposite directions. These opposing force field structures contain locked potential. The vortex motion within the structures is best described by the late “GREAT” Walter Russell below.

Vortex-motion-AB

THE MESSAGE: Nature’s energy distribution system operates as above at every scale. It is a process of generation and degeneration. Centrifugal forces become centripetal forces and back again to centrifugal and so on. There are never-ending changes in pressure that occur as the wave moves back and forth from node to anti-node bringing with it the inevitable points of destructive interference and constructive interference.

The unrecognized name of Nature’s distribution process is apsidal precession—a natural consequence of the differing axle lengths associated with an elliptical orbit (below).

Precessing_Kepler_orbit_280frames_e0.6_smaller

Apsidal Motion

 

SOLAR-SYSTEM SCHEMATIC

AntikytheraMechanismSchematic2

By Ronald G. Messick

TOMORROWS BREAKTHROUGHS WILL COME FROM THE VERY FRINGE OF SCIENTIFIC THINKING. HERE ARE JUST A FEW EXAMPLES OF REVOLUTIONARY IDEAS THAT ARE ALREADY IN PLAY.

Copyright